What does Watergate teach about presidential power?
In June 1972 burglars connected to Nixon’s reelection committee were arrested inside the Democratic National Committee’s offices at the Watergate complex. Investigations by the press, a Senate select committee and a special prosecutor revealed a cover-up directed from the White House and other abuses of power. In July 1974 the Supreme Court unanimously ordered the release of subpoenaed White House tapes, and the House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment. After a newly released tape showed Nixon had approved efforts to obstruct the FBI’s investigation, Republican congressional leaders told him he had lost the votes to survive, and he resigned.
The House Judiciary Committee and most historians
The committee’s bipartisan majority concluded that Nixon had obstructed justice, abused the powers of his office and defied congressional subpoenas. Most historians regard his resignation as proof that the constitutional system of checks worked.
Nixon and his defenders
Nixon maintained that he had no advance knowledge of the break-in. He and his defenders argued that many of his actions were motivated by national security concerns, and that earlier presidents had used wiretaps and federal agencies against opponents without being driven from office.
Sources
- Address to the Nation Announcing Decision To Resign the Office of President · The American Presidency Project, UC Santa Barbara
- Richard Nixon: Campaigns and Elections · Miller Center, University of Virginia
