Did the settlement of 1877 abandon Black Southerners?
Hayes took office after negotiations in which Southern Democrats accepted his victory and the new administration withdrew federal troops from the last Reconstruction statehouses. Historians have long called the arrangement the Compromise of 1877, though they disagree about how formal the bargain was.
Critics
Many historians, and Black leaders of the time, regard the withdrawal as the moment the federal government abandoned freedpeople to disfranchisement and violence. Within a generation Southern states had largely eliminated Black voting.
Hayes and his defenders
Hayes believed military occupation had lost Northern support and could not be sustained by a small army that the Democratic House was unwilling to fund. He sought pledges from Southern Democrats to respect Black citizens’ rights and later vetoed attempts to repeal federal election protections.
Scholarly debate
C. Vann Woodward’s 1951 study Reunion and Reaction argued that a detailed economic bargain decided the outcome. Later historians contend that no single deal was decisive and that Northern retreat from Reconstruction was already well advanced.
Sources
- Rutherford B. Hayes: Campaigns and Elections · Miller Center, University of Virginia
