Should Grant’s presidency be judged by its scandals or by its defense of civil rights?
For much of the twentieth century Grant ranked near the bottom of presidential surveys, remembered for the corruption of associates and appointees: the 1869 attempt by speculators Jay Gould and James Fisk to corner the gold market, the Whiskey Ring tax fraud, and the impeachment of Secretary of War William Belknap. Since the late twentieth century many historians have reassessed his record on Reconstruction, and his standing has risen.
Critics
Contemporaries, including the Liberal Republicans who opposed his reelection in 1872, charged that Grant tolerated cronyism, defended associates such as his private secretary Orville Babcock, who was indicted in the Whiskey Ring, and resisted meaningful civil service reform.
Reassessment
Recent biographers emphasize that Grant was not shown to have profited from any scandal, that he encouraged Treasury Secretary Benjamin Bristow’s prosecution of the Whiskey Ring, and that his enforcement of civil and voting rights in the South was the most vigorous of any nineteenth-century president.
Sources
- Ulysses S. Grant: Domestic Affairs · Miller Center, University of Virginia
