Legislation · 1993

Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993

Responding to Employment Division v. Smith (1990), in which the Supreme Court held that neutral, generally applicable laws need no special justification when they burden religious practice, Congress barred the government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion unless the burden furthers a compelling governmental interest by the least restrictive means. The bill passed the House without dissent and the Senate 97–3, and President Bill Clinton signed it into law.

PM·DOC·1993·052Primary Source
Date
November 16, 1993
Type
Legislation
Held by
National Archives

“Government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person — (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.”

November 16, 1993

Why it matters

In City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) the Supreme Court held that RFRA could not be applied to the states, but it still governs the federal government and was central to Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores (2014); many states have enacted their own versions.

Read the full text at govinfo.gov
Primary Source

The original record, reproduced or linked from the institution that holds it. Primary sources show what people said and did in their own words.

Subjects

From the library

Related Documents